Week 4 waiver wire & streamer report
PPR · 12-team · Sep 29 – Oct 5
draftwaiver.com — bids are a share of a full-season FAAB budget.
Waiver adds — week 4
| # | Player | Pos | Matchup | Grade | Score | FAAB | Tag | Bid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rome Odunze CHI | WR | vs NYJ | Smash spot | 57 | 6% | streamer | |
| 2 | Travis Hunter JAX | WR | @ CIN | Smash spot | 53 | 6% | streamer | |
| 3 | Colston Loveland CHI | TE | vs NYJ | Smash spot | 49 | 3% | streamer | |
| 4 | Tyler Allgeier ATL | RB | @ NO | Neutral | 49 | 2% | speculative | |
| 5 | Cam Skattebo NYG | RB | vs ARI | Smash spot | 48 | 3% | streamer | |
| 6 | Trevor Lawrence JAX | QB | @ CIN | Smash spot | 47 | 3% | speculative | |
| 7 | Tyrone Tracy Jr. NYG | RB | vs ARI | Smash spot | 46 | 3% | speculative | |
| 8 | Caleb Williams CHI | QB | vs NYJ | Smash spot | 46 | 3% | speculative | |
| 9 | Rashee Rice KC | WR | @ LV | Good matchup | 44 | 3% | speculative | |
| 10 | Isiah Pacheco KC | RB | @ LV | Good matchup | 43 | 3% | speculative | |
| 11 | Aaron Jones MIN | RB | vs MIA | Neutral | 42 | 3% | speculative | |
| 12 | David Montgomery DET | RB | @ CAR | Neutral | 42 | 2% | speculative | |
| 13 | Jameson Williams DET | WR | @ CAR | Neutral | 41 | 3% | speculative | |
| 14 | Deebo Samuel WAS | WR | vs IND | Neutral | 40 | 3% | speculative | |
| 15 | DJ Giddens IND | RB | @ WAS | Good matchup | 40 | 2% | speculative | |
| 16 | Tucker Kraft GB | TE | @ TB | Neutral | 38 | 1% | speculative | |
| 17 | Michael Pittman Jr. IND | WR | @ WAS | Good matchup | 38 | 1% | speculative | |
| 18 | Will Shipley PHI | RB | vs LAR | Tough | 38 | 1% | speculative | |
| 19 | Evan Engram DEN | TE | @ SF | Tough | 36 | 1% | speculative | |
| 20 | Brian Robinson Jr. WAS | RB | vs IND | Neutral | 36 | 1% | speculative |
Drop candidates
- Justin Herbert QB · LAC — @ SEA is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
- Brock Purdy QB · SF — vs DEN is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
- Najee Harris RB · LAC — @ SEA is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
- Jake Ferguson TE · DAL — @ HOU is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
- Zach Charbonnet RB · SEA — vs LAC is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
- Keon Coleman WR · BUF — vs NE is a nightmare draw and there is a better add above him at the same position.
Defense streamers — week 4
| # | Defense | Matchup | Grade | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DET | @ CAR | Smash spot | 81 | CAR ranks 1/10 on offense by projected skill-position points. |
| 2 | BAL | vs TEN | Smash spot | 75 | TEN ranks 2.3/10 on offense by projected skill-position points, and this one is at home. |
| 3 | CLE | vs PIT | Good matchup | 63 | PIT ranks 3.7/10 on offense by projected skill-position points, and this one is at home. |
| 4 | DAL | @ HOU | Good matchup | 62 | HOU ranks 3.1/10 on offense by projected skill-position points. |
| 5 | WAS | vs IND | Good matchup | 61 | IND ranks 3.9/10 on offense by projected skill-position points, and this one is at home. |
| 6 | PIT | @ CLE | Good matchup | 60 | CLE ranks 3.3/10 on offense by projected skill-position points. |
| 7 | ATL | @ NO | Good matchup | 59 | NO ranks 3.5/10 on offense by projected skill-position points. |
| 8 | BUF | vs NE | Good matchup | 58 | NE ranks 4.2/10 on offense by projected skill-position points, and this one is at home. |
Kicker streamers — week 4
| # | Kicker | Matchup | Grade | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BAL | vs TEN | Smash spot | 88 | BAL rates 8.7/10 on offense against a TEN defense that grades 2.4/10 for difficulty. |
| 2 | CHI | vs NYJ | Smash spot | 75 | CHI rates 5.9/10 on offense against a NYJ defense that grades 1.3/10 for difficulty. |
| 3 | DET | @ CAR | Neutral | 73 | DET rates 9.7/10 on offense against a CAR defense that grades 6.4/10 for difficulty. |
| 4 | CIN | vs JAX | Nightmare | 72 | CIN rates 10/10 on offense against a JAX defense that grades 8.2/10 for difficulty. |
| 5 | JAX | @ CIN | Smash spot | 72 | JAX rates 6.6/10 on offense against a CIN defense that grades 1.8/10 for difficulty. |
| 6 | PHI | vs LAR | Tough | 70 | PHI rates 9.4/10 on offense against a LAR defense that grades 7.8/10 for difficulty. |
| 7 | WAS | vs IND | Neutral | 70 | WAS rates 7.6/10 on offense against a IND defense that grades 5.1/10 for difficulty. |
| 8 | NYG | vs ARI | Smash spot | 69 | NYG rates 5.3/10 on offense against a ARI defense that grades 2/10 for difficulty. |